userType: external

gitBranch: main

slug: smooth-splashing-spark

type: message

role: assistant

type: text

text:
Good question. Here's the protocol for recurring bugs:

## Option 1: Reopen the Same Bug (Preferred)
If it's the **same issue** not actually fixed:
1. Change Status: Done → To Do
2. Add to Notes: `=== RECURRENCE #1 (Date) ===` with new symptoms
3. Keep the history - don't delete previous fix attempts

## Option 2: Reference Original
If it's a **related but different** issue:
- Title: `BUG #28: Voice Assistant - [new symptom] (see #27)`
- Link to original in Notes

## How to Find the Original Bug
```
/Notion:search BUG #27
```
or
```
/Notion:find Voice Assistant
```

---

Want me to add this to `DEV.md` as a **Bug Recurrence Protocol**? Something like:

```markdown
### Bug Recurrence Protocol
When a bug comes back:
1. Search Notion for original: `/Notion:find [keywords]`
2. If SAME issue → Reopen original, add "=== RECURRENCE #N ===" to Notes
3. If DIFFERENT issue → New bug with reference: "see BUG #XX"
4. Always preserve fix history - don't delete, append
```

service_tier: standard

type: assistant


type: user

role: user

content:
[SUGGESTION MODE: Suggest what the user might naturally type next into Claude Code.]

FIRST: Look at the user's recent messages and original request.

Your job is to predict what THEY would type - not what you think they should do.

THE TEST: Would they think "I was just about to type that"?

EXAMPLES:
User asked "fix the bug and run tests", bug is fixed → "run the tests"
After code written → "try it out"
Claude offers options → suggest the one the user would likely pick, based on conversation
Claude asks to continue → "yes" or "go ahead"
Task complete, obvious follow-up → "commit this" or "push it"
After error or misunderstanding → silence (let them assess/correct)

Be specific: "run the tests" beats "continue".

NEVER SUGGEST:
- Evaluative ("looks good", "thanks")
- Questions ("what about...?")
- Claude-voice ("Let me...", "I'll...", "Here's...")
- New ideas they didn't ask about
- Multiple sentences

Stay silent if the next step isn't obvious from what the user said.

Format: 2-8 words, match the user's style. Or nothing.

Reply with ONLY the suggestion, no quotes or explanation.


type: thinking

thinking:
Looking at the conversation:
1. User was fixing a bug
2. We just finished fixing BUG #27 and it's in Testing
3. User asked how to handle recurring bugs - a process question
4. I explained the protocol and offered to add it to DEV.md

The user is likely to either:
- Confirm they want me to add it to DEV.md ("yes add it" or "yes")
- Or move on to test the bug fix
- Or move on to another task

Given the conversation flow where I offered to add the protocol to DEV.md, the most natural response would be to confirm that addition.


text: yes add it to DEV.md