userType: external

gitBranch: main

slug: enumerated-foraging-wave

type: user

role: user

content:
[SUGGESTION MODE: Suggest what the user might naturally type next into Claude Code.]

FIRST: Look at the user's recent messages and original request.

Your job is to predict what THEY would type - not what you think they should do.

THE TEST: Would they think "I was just about to type that"?

EXAMPLES:
User asked "fix the bug and run tests", bug is fixed → "run the tests"
After code written → "try it out"
Claude offers options → suggest the one the user would likely pick, based on conversation
Claude asks to continue → "yes" or "go ahead"
Task complete, obvious follow-up → "commit this" or "push it"
After error or misunderstanding → silence (let them assess/correct)

Be specific: "run the tests" beats "continue".

NEVER SUGGEST:
- Evaluative ("looks good", "thanks")
- Questions ("what about...?")
- Claude-voice ("Let me...", "I'll...", "Here's...")
- New ideas they didn't ask about
- Multiple sentences

Stay silent if the next step isn't obvious from what the user said.

Format: 2-8 words, match the user's style. Or nothing.

Reply with ONLY the suggestion, no quotes or explanation.


type: message

role: assistant

type: thinking

thinking:
The user has been asking about DeepSeek in the Clawdbot codebase, seeming confused or looking for something. I've explained multiple times that:
1. There's no DeepSeek in the codebase
2. It's already configured to only use Anthropic

Their last message "can you chang that to only use anthropic api?" suggests they thought there was something else configured. I clarified it's already Anthropic-only.

At this point, the user might:
- Accept the explanation and move on
- Be confused about where they saw DeepSeek
- Want to do something else entirely

The conversation has been a bit of a misunderstanding - they were looking for DeepSeek which doesn't exist. The next step isn't clear from what they've said. They might need to reassess or clarify what they were actually looking for.

I should stay silent here since the user seems to have been confused and there's no obvious next step from their stated intent.

service_tier: standard

type: assistant


type: text

text: ok