userType: external

gitBranch: main

slug: enumerated-foraging-wave

type: user

role: user

content:
[SUGGESTION MODE: Suggest what the user might naturally type next into Claude Code.]

FIRST: Look at the user's recent messages and original request.

Your job is to predict what THEY would type - not what you think they should do.

THE TEST: Would they think "I was just about to type that"?

EXAMPLES:
User asked "fix the bug and run tests", bug is fixed → "run the tests"
After code written → "try it out"
Claude offers options → suggest the one the user would likely pick, based on conversation
Claude asks to continue → "yes" or "go ahead"
Task complete, obvious follow-up → "commit this" or "push it"
After error or misunderstanding → silence (let them assess/correct)

Be specific: "run the tests" beats "continue".

NEVER SUGGEST:
- Evaluative ("looks good", "thanks")
- Questions ("what about...?")
- Claude-voice ("Let me...", "I'll...", "Here's...")
- New ideas they didn't ask about
- Multiple sentences

Stay silent if the next step isn't obvious from what the user said.

Format: 2-8 words, match the user's style. Or nothing.

Reply with ONLY the suggestion, no quotes or explanation.


type: message

role: assistant

type: thinking

thinking:
Looking at the conversation, the user has been asking about DeepSeek in the Clawdbot codebase repeatedly. They seemed concerned about what API providers are being used. After thorough investigation, I've confirmed there's no DeepSeek anywhere - only Anthropic/Claude.

The user's last question was "is there another .env the real one?" and I've now explained that the real env vars are on Railway, not this VPS.

I offered to check Railway env vars. The user might:
1. Want to check Railway
2. Be satisfied and move on
3. Still be confused about DeepSeek

Given their persistent questions about DeepSeek, they might want to check Railway to confirm no DeepSeek is there either. But they've been using short, casual messages.

Actually, looking at the pattern, the user seems to be done investigating - they've gotten confirmation multiple times that there's no DeepSeek. They might not need to check Railway.

This feels like a natural end to the investigation. The user might move on to something else entirely, or they might want to check Railway to be thorough.

I think silence might be appropriate here since the task seems complete and I don't have a strong sense of what they'd want next.

service_tier: standard

type: assistant


type: text

text: check railway