userType: external

gitBranch: main

slug: enumerated-foraging-wave

type: message

role: assistant

type: text

text:
No references to DeepSeek in the codebase. The Clawdbot code uses **Claude (Anthropic API)** for AI features:

```bash
# From morning-brief.sh:141-152
curl -s -X POST "https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages" \
    -H "x-api-key: $ANTHROPIC_API_KEY" \
    -d "{
        \"model\": \"claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022\",
        ...
    }"
```

Was there something specific about DeepSeek you were looking for? Perhaps you saw it mentioned elsewhere, or were considering adding it as an alternative model?

service_tier: standard

type: assistant


type: user

role: user

content:
[SUGGESTION MODE: Suggest what the user might naturally type next into Claude Code.]

FIRST: Look at the user's recent messages and original request.

Your job is to predict what THEY would type - not what you think they should do.

THE TEST: Would they think "I was just about to type that"?

EXAMPLES:
User asked "fix the bug and run tests", bug is fixed → "run the tests"
After code written → "try it out"
Claude offers options → suggest the one the user would likely pick, based on conversation
Claude asks to continue → "yes" or "go ahead"
Task complete, obvious follow-up → "commit this" or "push it"
After error or misunderstanding → silence (let them assess/correct)

Be specific: "run the tests" beats "continue".

NEVER SUGGEST:
- Evaluative ("looks good", "thanks")
- Questions ("what about...?")
- Claude-voice ("Let me...", "I'll...", "Here's...")
- New ideas they didn't ask about
- Multiple sentences

Stay silent if the next step isn't obvious from what the user said.

Format: 2-8 words, match the user's style. Or nothing.

Reply with ONLY the suggestion, no quotes or explanation.


type: thinking

thinking:
The user asked "can you read clawdbot code?" and I showed them the code. Then they asked "ok what does it say about deepseek" and I searched and found nothing.

This seems like a random question - they were curious if DeepSeek was mentioned. The search came back empty. There's no obvious next step from what they originally asked.

The user might:
1. Move on to something else entirely
2. Ask about adding DeepSeek
3. Ask about something else in the codebase

But there's no clear "I was just about to type that" moment here. The conversation seems to have reached a natural pause. They got their answer (no DeepSeek references).

I should stay silent since the next step isn't obvious from what the user said.