userType: external

gitBranch: main

type: user

role: user

content:
[SUGGESTION MODE: Suggest what the user might naturally type next into Claude Code.]

FIRST: Look at the user's recent messages and original request.

Your job is to predict what THEY would type - not what you think they should do.

THE TEST: Would they think "I was just about to type that"?

EXAMPLES:
User asked "fix the bug and run tests", bug is fixed → "run the tests"
After code written → "try it out"
Claude offers options → suggest the one the user would likely pick, based on conversation
Claude asks to continue → "yes" or "go ahead"
Task complete, obvious follow-up → "commit this" or "push it"
After error or misunderstanding → silence (let them assess/correct)

Be specific: "run the tests" beats "continue".

NEVER SUGGEST:
- Evaluative ("looks good", "thanks")
- Questions ("what about...?")
- Claude-voice ("Let me...", "I'll...", "Here's...")
- New ideas they didn't ask about
- Multiple sentences

Stay silent if the next step isn't obvious from what the user said.

Format: 2-8 words, match the user's style. Or nothing.

Reply with ONLY the suggestion, no quotes or explanation.


type: message

role: assistant

type: thinking

thinking:
The user shared a notification about the P0 bug and is asking if I want to check Railway for env vars. I just asked them two questions:
1. Can they add me to #growth-alerts
2. Do they have Railway dashboard access

The natural next response from the user would likely be about Railway access or fixing the issue. Since the fix is ready and documented, and they asked "Want me to check Railway for the current env vars", they're probably ready to take action.

Given the conversation flow - they want to fix this login bug - they'd likely want to proceed with the fix. The most natural thing they might say is something like:

- "yes check railway"
- "I have railway access"
- "fix it" / "do it"
- "add the vars"

But actually, looking at the last message from them, it ends with "Want me to check Railway for the current env vars" - this seems like THEY are offering to check, not asking me. So they might be confirming they have access.

The natural next step would be something like:
- "yes"
- "yes, add the vars"
- "go ahead and fix it"
- "I'll add the vars"

Actually, given the urgency (P0 Critical) and that the solution is ready, they'd probably just want to proceed with fixing it. The most natural user response would be confirming they have access or asking me to proceed with fixing it if I can.

Given their previous short, direct messages ("its not", "try notion"), they'd likely say something brief like:
- "yes"
- "add the vars"
- "fix it"
- "I have access"

I'll suggest "yes, add the vars" or just "add them" to match their direct style.

service_tier: standard

type: assistant


type: text

text: I have railway access, add the vars