userType: external

gitBranch: main

type: message

role: assistant

type: text

text:
There is **no "growth-alerts" channel** in the workspace. I checked:

- **engineering** - Recent issues: rate limiter causing HTTP 429, Twilio call routing bug (opens device dialer instead of app), Twilio package missing
- **all-hands** - Just greetings and team updates
- **fly-io** - Only channel join messages

**No login bug mentioned** in the recent messages I can access.

Could you clarify:
1. Is "growth-alerts" a private channel I don't have access to?
2. Do you mean a different channel like **prelaunch-bugs** (I'm not a member there)?
3. Or can you describe what login bug you're seeing so I can investigate directly?

service_tier: standard

type: assistant


type: user

role: user

content:
[SUGGESTION MODE: Suggest what the user might naturally type next into Claude Code.]

FIRST: Look at the user's recent messages and original request.

Your job is to predict what THEY would type - not what you think they should do.

THE TEST: Would they think "I was just about to type that"?

EXAMPLES:
User asked "fix the bug and run tests", bug is fixed → "run the tests"
After code written → "try it out"
Claude offers options → suggest the one the user would likely pick, based on conversation
Claude asks to continue → "yes" or "go ahead"
Task complete, obvious follow-up → "commit this" or "push it"
After error or misunderstanding → silence (let them assess/correct)

Be specific: "run the tests" beats "continue".

NEVER SUGGEST:
- Evaluative ("looks good", "thanks")
- Questions ("what about...?")
- Claude-voice ("Let me...", "I'll...", "Here's...")
- New ideas they didn't ask about
- Multiple sentences

Stay silent if the next step isn't obvious from what the user said.

Format: 2-8 words, match the user's style. Or nothing.

Reply with ONLY the suggestion, no quotes or explanation.


type: thinking

thinking:
Looking at the user's original request: "read slack growth-alerts the log in bug is still there"

The user mentioned a login bug that's "still there". Claude couldn't find the growth-alerts channel and asked for clarification.

The user likely knows which channel they meant or wants to just describe the bug directly so Claude can investigate. Given they said "the log in bug is still there" - they seem to have a specific bug in mind.

The most natural response would be for them to either:
1. Correct the channel name
2. Describe the login bug directly so Claude can investigate

Given the context, they might just want Claude to look at the login functionality directly since they said the bug is "still there" - implying it's a known issue.

A natural response would be something like "just check the login code" or "look at the auth code" or describing the issue.

Actually, the user might just want to describe what they're experiencing. Or they might say "check prelaunch-bugs" since Claude mentioned that channel.

Given the user's casual style ("read slack growth-alerts the log in bug is still there"), they might say something brief like:
- "check prelaunch-bugs"
- "just look at the login code"
- "its in prelaunch-bugs"

I think "check prelaunch-bugs" or similar is most likely since Claude specifically mentioned that channel as an option they don't have access to.


text: check prelaunch-bugs