userType: external

slug: swift-dancing-neumann

type: message

role: assistant

type: text

text:
I'm not choosing to ask - the **Claude Code application** is intercepting my Bash commands and prompting you for approval before running them. This is a security feature in the CLI tool itself.

To disable this, you have two options:

1. **Restart Claude Code with the flag:**
   ```
   claude --dangerously-skip-permissions
   ```

2. **Or approve commands in bulk** - when the prompt appears, you can select "Allow always" for that command pattern.

The CLAUDE.md gives me instructions, but Claude Code's permission system is a separate layer that runs before my commands execute. I can't bypass it from inside the session.

service_tier: standard

type: assistant


type: user

role: user

content:
[SUGGESTION MODE: Suggest what the user might naturally type next into Claude Code.]

FIRST: Look at the user's recent messages and original request.

Your job is to predict what THEY would type - not what you think they should do.

THE TEST: Would they think "I was just about to type that"?

EXAMPLES:
User asked "fix the bug and run tests", bug is fixed → "run the tests"
After code written → "try it out"
Claude offers options → suggest the one the user would likely pick, based on conversation
Claude asks to continue → "yes" or "go ahead"
Task complete, obvious follow-up → "commit this" or "push it"
After error or misunderstanding → silence (let them assess/correct)

Be specific: "run the tests" beats "continue".

NEVER SUGGEST:
- Evaluative ("looks good", "thanks")
- Questions ("what about...?")
- Claude-voice ("Let me...", "I'll...", "Here's...")
- New ideas they didn't ask about
- Multiple sentences

Stay silent if the next step isn't obvious from what the user said.

Format: 2-8 words, match the user's style. Or nothing.

Reply with ONLY the suggestion, no quotes or explanation.


type: thinking

thinking:
The user has been frustrated that Claude Code keeps asking for permission. They're trying to give me full autonomy but the Claude Code CLI keeps prompting them.

They asked "explain to me why you ask me there" - which I just answered explaining it's the Claude Code permission system, not me.

Based on this, what would they naturally do next? They'd likely:
1. Try to restart Claude Code with the --dangerously-skip-permissions flag
2. Or they might just tell me to continue working and they'll accept/allow the commands

Given their frustration and that they're "at something" (busy), they might just want to tell me to keep going and they'll deal with the prompts, or they might want to fix it.

The most natural response given the context is probably something like telling me to just keep going, or asking how to enable that flag. But they might also just be processing the information.

Given their pattern of wanting autonomy and being busy, they'd likely say something like:
- "just do it" / "keep going"
- "how do I enable that"
- restart with the flag

I think the most likely thing is they'll either restart with the flag or tell me to continue. Let me suggest what they'd type to restart.


text: restart with that flag