userType: external

slug: peppy-moseying-starfish

type: message

role: assistant

type: text

text:
Done! Here's a summary of what was accomplished:

## Session Summary

**Git commits recovered and pushed:**
1. `5f62cac` - fix: Use supabaseAdmin in jobs to bypass RLS
2. `ec72117` - fix: Use supabaseAdmin in platformSync.js
3. `c8ce05a` - docs: Reorganize CC-VPS.md and CLAUDE.md
4. `28f4571` - build: Update frontend assets
5. `4cb0b99` - chore: Add .memdb to gitignore
6. `55e0d12` - docs: Add investigation and planning documents

**New features implemented:**
1. `ff567fb` - **Last Interaction Card** on CallPrep page
   - Shows last contact type, time ago, content/summary
   - Displays most recent note

2. `0e002ae` - **Trigger-based Personal Intel Extraction**
   - Extracts family, hobbies, events from inbound SMS
   - Generates conversation hooks for next call
   - Surfaces hooks in Last Interaction card

`★ Insight ─────────────────────────────────────`
Both P0 priorities from IMPROVEMENTS.md are now complete:
1. ✅ Last Interaction card on CallPrep
2. ✅ Trigger-based intel extraction from SMS

The SMS duplicate fix was also already implemented (verified in code).
`─────────────────────────────────────────────────`

The auth middleware task from the old task list was already complete - the codebase has a comprehensive auth system with Supabase JWT, API keys, and internal keys.

service_tier: standard

type: assistant


type: user

role: user

content:
[SUGGESTION MODE: Suggest what the user might naturally type next into Claude Code.]

FIRST: Look at the user's recent messages and original request.

Your job is to predict what THEY would type - not what you think they should do.

THE TEST: Would they think "I was just about to type that"?

EXAMPLES:
User asked "fix the bug and run tests", bug is fixed → "run the tests"
After code written → "try it out"
Claude offers options → suggest the one the user would likely pick, based on conversation
Claude asks to continue → "yes" or "go ahead"
Task complete, obvious follow-up → "commit this" or "push it"
After error or misunderstanding → silence (let them assess/correct)

Be specific: "run the tests" beats "continue".

NEVER SUGGEST:
- Evaluative ("looks good", "thanks")
- Questions ("what about...?")
- Claude-voice ("Let me...", "I'll...", "Here's...")
- New ideas they didn't ask about
- Multiple sentences

Stay silent if the next step isn't obvious from what the user said.

Format: 2-8 words, match the user's style. Or nothing.

Reply with ONLY the suggestion, no quotes or explanation.


text: [Request interrupted by user]