vjjZ/,dZddlmZddlZddlZddlZddlZddlmZmZm Z m Z ddl m Z ddl mZddlZddlmZmZddlmZdd lmZdd lmZmZdd lmZmZdd lmZed z dz Zedz ZdZ dZ!d$dZ"d%dZ#d&dZ$d'dZ%d(dZ& d)dZ'd*d+dZ(d,d-dZ)d.dZ*d/d0dZ+e,dk(rPejZdZ.e.j_dd d!"e.jaZ1 e2e+e1jfy#e4$rZ5e*e5e2d#dZ5[5wwxYw)1zGCollect, classify, register, render, and send the personal inbox brief.) annotationsN)datedatetime timedeltatimezone) parseaddr)Any) Collectioncollect) judgement_for)record_failure)ROOTsend) REGISTER_PATHappend_deadlines)write_findingsstatezlast_brief.jsonz inbox-voice<zpersonal-cos-brief.timercPt|\}}|jdxs|xsdS)N"zUnknown sender)rstrip)valuenameaddresss /root/personal-cos/brief.py _sender_namer&s)e$MD' ::c? 9g 9)99c|sy tj|jjdS#t$rYywxYw)Nz time unknown%H:%M)r fromisoformat astimezonestrftime ValueError)rs r _local_timer$+sD %%e,779BB7KK s17 AAcltjsgStjj j }|t tz}i}tjdjD]}|jstj|} t j|d}||cxkr|ksNnQ|d|d|df}|j!|}|r |d|dkDs~|||<t#|j%d S#ttf$rYwxYw) N)daysutf-8encodingrsource_subject source_sender last_seenc0|d|jddfS)Nraccountsignup)get)items rz%_upcoming_deadlines..Ps$v,H(EFr)key)rexistsrnowr!rr HORIZON_DAYS read_text splitlinesrjsonloadsr KeyErrorr#r0sortedvalues)todayendlatestlinerecordduer3previouss r_upcoming_deadlinesrE4s*    ! LLN % % ' , , .E ). .C>@F''9DDF%zz| D! $$VF^4C C 3  v'('C zz#Hvk2Xk5JJ$s '%(   F *%   s*D!!D32D3cxtjddtdtjDS)NTparentsexist_okc3^K|]%}|jr|jdk7rd'yw)z.gitkeepN)is_filer).0paths r z_voice_count..Vs,  <<>dii:5 s+-) VOICE_DIRmkdirsumiterdirrr _voice_countrUTs5 OOD4O0 %%' rctj|jj}d|j dd}|j r)|j dk(rdnd}|d|j d|d z }|j r|d z }|S) Nz Covered to r.rKemailemails z work z excluded.z# Coverage re-baselined over 7 days.)rr covered_to_utcr!r"excluded_work_countcoverage_rebaselined) collectioncoveredrAnouns r_coverage_linera]s$$Z%>%>?JJLG ))'231 5D%%$88A=w8 !J2236$zJJ&& 55 Krc R|Dcgc] }|ddk(s |}}t}t|}|s`|s^dg}|j|jxsgdd|r|j d|d|j |dj |St jj}d|jd g}t|Dchc]}|jd d c}|Dchc]}|jd d c}z} | D]Y} |Dcgc]}|jd d | k(s|} }| s,| Dcgc] }|ddk(s |} }td | D} td | D}|jd| jg| ddD]}|jdr*dtj|djdnd}|j d|dxsd||j dt!|ddt#|d| r|j d| d|r|j d|dt%|dk\sZn|rc|dd}|jddg|ddD]C}tj|d jd}|j d|d|d!Et'|jxsg}|r|j d|d|j|dt)d"d#t%|z |dd#}t+}|r.|jdd$g|jd%|d&D|j |dj |Scc}wcc}wcc}wcc}wcc}w)'NbucketACTzNothing needing you.zVoice: z captures waiting. u PERSONAL — z%a %d %br.r/c3,K|] }|ddk(yw)rcREVIEWNrTrMr1s rrOzrender..sS$4>X5Sc3,K|] }|ddk(yw)rcNOTENrTris rrOzrender..sOdh61Orjnormalized_datez, due z%d %b- subjectz (no subject)z senderz, message_datezREVIEW z itemszNEW z others, nothing found z COMING UPrr*rzWORTH A THOUGHTc3&K|] }d| yw)rpNrT)rMrAs rrOzrender..s>Tr$[>slines)rEraextendnotesappendjoinrr5r!r"r<r0rRupperrr rr$lenlistmaxr )r^findings voice_countr1act deadlinescoveragerwr5accountsr.account_findings account_act review_count note_count date_textrC summary_linesthoughts rrenderrhs% @DX%(?4 @C @#%Ij)H y'( j&&,"bq12  LL7;-/AB C Xyy ,,. # # %CS\\*56 7 8E3;<4)X &<5> ?T488Ix ( ? @H% )X)F')QD   (8TDNeNOO  b'--/*+O D88-.++D1B,CDMMgVWX  LL2d9o?@ L M LL\$x.12"tN3457    LL8L>8 9  LL8J  ?))/R0Mw{m3EFG LL8QSZ!89: #2JE oG b+,- >WW-=>> LL 99U S A = ? Us. NNN/N N6N N$N$c tjddtdddgddd}|j j }|jd k7s|r|d vry tj|d d dj}ttjj|z j|kS#ttjf$rYy wxYw#t$rYy wxYw)u4Did the systemd timer start this run, or did a human? Asks systemd when the timer last fired and compares it to now. This replaces a clock-window check (is it near 18:30?) which was wrong in BOTH directions: - It did not catch what it was built for. The false day that motivated it came from `systemctl start` at 18:46 — sixteen minutes from the slot, inside the twenty-minute window. It would have counted anyway. - It broke the case that matters more. The timer is Persistent=true, so a box that was down at 18:30 fires the brief late on catch-up. The brief lands, the day is real, and a clock window would refuse to count it — silently resetting the fourteen-day clock while the counter still looked healthy. Asking systemd is the honest question: a timer firing sets LastTriggerUSec, a human typing `systemctl start` does not. Returns False when it cannot tell — no systemd, no timer, unparseable value. A run that cannot be PROVEN unattended does not count toward the fourteen. The window is 30 minutes, not 5. A brief takes ~110 seconds, and a slow one takes longer — tonight a single IMAP account blocked for 60s on its own. Checked at the END of a slow run against a 5-minute window, a genuine timer fire would have failed the test and silently not counted, which is the same silent-clock-reset this replaced. 30 minutes covers any plausible run while still separating a timer fire from a human at a different hour; nothing fires this timer more than once a day. systemctlshowz-pLastTriggerUSecz--valueT)capture_outputtexttimeoutFr>n/a0z%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S) subprocessrun TIMER_UNITOSErrorSubprocessErrorstdoutr returncoderstrptimer!r#absr5 total_seconds)max_skew_secondsresultstampfireds r_timer_initiatedrs6 &*d4Ey Q   MM   !E AUe|.C!!%"+/BCNNP  ))+e3BBD EIY YY Z// 0 s##B<'C<CC C'&C'c2tjjddtjt j jtj|jdj|rdndd}||r(n |r%trtjd|d<n |r d|d <d |d <tjd }|j!t#j$|d dzd|j'ty)NTrGr'schedulemanual) sent_at_utc brief_sha256triggerstreakunattended_streakrz1carried --scheduled but the timer did not fire it_notez .json.tmprn)indentrfr()LAST_BRIEF_PATHparentrQrr5rutc isoformathashlibsha256encode hexdigestrrrB with_suffix write_textr9dumpsreplace)r scheduled unattendedr temporarys r_record_successrs   =||HLL1;;=t{{7';<FFH!*: E  +z)@P@R&,]]_X%>!" #iLg++K8I E!4t;gN o&rctd|} td|s%td}td|}td|td|y#t$r$}td|}td|Yd}~7d}~wwxYw)NzPersonal brief failedzPERSONAL BRIEF FAILED z,Telegram failure notification returned Falsez*Personal brief failure notification failedz,Personal brief failure notification failed: zPersonal brief failed: )r r RuntimeErrorprint Exception)error safe_messagenotification_errornotification_summarys r_report_failurers!"95AL U-l^<=!-.\!] #1<>P$  @AU@VW X  #L> 23 U- 8:L  <=QrsIM" 88! '#*4 .#44 =  ( : @LL&:LILLL^,Z^'&4   z $X $ $1Q RF  N !!#Ii11233 ms C99D>DD